Legislature(2003 - 2004)

05/06/2003 03:45 PM Senate STA

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
         SJR 18-CONST. AM: PF APPROPS/INFLATION-PROOFING                                                                    
                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  GARY STEVENS  asked for  a  motion to  adopt the  committee                                                              
substitute (CS) for SJR 18.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR GRETCHEN  GUESS made  a motion  to adopt  CSSJR 18  as the                                                              
working document. There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
ROBERT STORER,  Executive  Director of the  Alaska Permanent  Fund                                                              
Corporation, stated that the Permanent  Fund Board of Trustees has                                                              
concluded  there  is a  need  for  a constitutional  amendment  to                                                              
adjust inflation  proofing on the Alaska Permanent  Fund. Limiting                                                              
the amount of  funds that could be appropriated in  any given year                                                              
would  do that.  They  propose the  methodology  be  changed to  a                                                              
percentage  of  market  value  (POMV),   which  is  consistent  in                                                              
approach with about  70 percent of the endowments  and foundations                                                              
in  the country.  They suggest  limiting the  appropriation to  no                                                              
more than  five percent  of the  five year  moving average  of the                                                              
total fund.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
He noted  that copies of  a power point  presentation were  in the                                                              
members' bill packets and pointed out five key differences.                                                                     
     · Percentage of Market Value offers constitutional                                                                         
       inflation  proofing  and  protection  of the  entire  fund.                                                              
       Status  quo  statutorily  inflation  proofs just  the  fund                                                              
       principal.                                                                                                               
     · The proposed is a spending limit because more than five                                                                  
       percent   of  the  five   year  moving  average   could  be                                                              
       appropriated.  Status  quo  is  that  the  entire  earnings                                                              
       reserve may be appropriated.                                                                                             
     · POMV improves the stability of the amount that may be                                                                    
       appropriated  in  any given  year.  Current methodology  of                                                              
       using  realized income is  considerably more  volatile than                                                              
       using a POMV.                                                                                                            
     · Five percent POMV is compatible with the diversified                                                                     
       portfolio  the fund  has in these  volatile times.  Current                                                              
       methodology was  established 26 or 27 years  ago when there                                                              
       wasn't a  lot of volatility and people  thought about fixed                                                              
       income securities, cash flow and clipping coupons for                                                                    
       interest payments.                                                                                                       
     · Stability means predictability and is very important from                                                                
       year to year for decision makers. Currently the dividend                                                                 
       is based on a five year realized income and is a moving                                                                  
       average.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  JOHN  COWDERY  asked  why data  from  the  previous  year                                                              
wouldn't be used.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
BOB BARTHOLOMEW,  Chief Operating Officer of the  Alaska Permanent                                                              
Fund  Corporation, explained  that in  going back  one extra  year                                                              
legislators would know when the session  begins in January exactly                                                              
how  much  would  be  available  for  the  budget.  Forecasts  and                                                              
predictions wouldn't be necessary.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER added the increased predictability  works to everyone's                                                              
advantage by allowing for more informed decisions.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  COWDERY asked  if  they thought  that  dividends were  an                                                              
appropriate use of the fund.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER replied the Board of Trustees  has always felt that how                                                              
the money  is appropriated  is the  providence of the  Legislature                                                              
and they have avoided any discussions  or opinions on the subject.                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BARTHOLOMEW said  he would  like  to go  through the  changes                                                              
between the original legislation and the CS.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
TAPE 03-27, SIDE A                                                                                                            
5:15 pm                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                              
   · The title speaks to the five percent and that the goal is to                                                               
     protect the fund and its purchasing power from inflation.                                                                  
     The changes are long term not on a year-to-year basis.                                                                     
   · Page 1, line 10 adds subsection b to the constitution.                                                                     
   · Line 11 the word "principal" is removed, which is a                                                                        
     significant policy discussion that the board recommends to                                                                 
     ensure an annual distribution.                                                                                             
   · Lines 13 and 14 deletes that all income from the permanent                                                                 
     fund shall be deposited in the general fund unless otherwise                                                               
     provided. All income will remain in the permanent fund until                                                               
     appropriated subject to the five percent.                                                                                  
   · Page 2 subparagraph b adds a sentence that states how the                                                                  
     permanent fund will be protected going forward.                                                                            
   · Line 7, section 3 is transitional language and clearly a                                                                   
     statement of law that the earnings of the permanent fund                                                                   
     that exist on the date this would pass the vote of the                                                                     
     people are part of the permanent fund.                                                                                     
   · Section 4 says that at the next general election in November                                                               
     2004, the voters of the State of Alaska would decide whether                                                               
     changes would be made to the way distributions from the                                                                    
     permanent fund are determined.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  GARY  STEVENS  asked what  happens  to  the  Constitutional                                                              
Budget  Reserve (CBR).  He understood  that  the Earnings  Reserve                                                              
Account (ERA) would disappear into the fund itself.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARTHOLOMEW  explained the  CBR is a  sub-fund of  the general                                                              
fund and  wouldn't be  affected by  the amendment. Currently,  the                                                              
permanent  fund consists  of principal  and  earnings reserve  and                                                              
they are all invested the same and  the CS would merge the two and                                                              
it would be referred to as the fund.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR FRED DYSON  said he hopes to never again  see the day that                                                              
it's  a   presumptuous   statement  to   say  that  limiting   the                                                              
appropriation to five percent is  inflation proofing, but he would                                                              
like to hear a comment on that.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER said the board spent a  great deal of time studying the                                                              
issue and  has determined that limiting  the draw to  five percent                                                              
would be  the high  end to  achieve their  goal. There are  times,                                                              
like  now, that  drawing five  percent you  wouldn't be  inflation                                                              
proofing, but then there are other  times that you would earn well                                                              
in excess of that. The key is that  the five percent limit creates                                                              
discipline  in great years.  Seventy six  years of data  indicates                                                              
that the five percent is achievable over time.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  DYSON asked  how the board  plans to  educate the  voting                                                              
public.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER  acknowledged  their plans aren't  fully developed  but                                                              
the board  is sensitive  to the  issue in  statute that  prohibits                                                              
using corporate  or fund assets  for political purposes.  However,                                                              
they believe it  is within their providence to  educate the public                                                              
when they are publicly speaking about  the fund performance, which                                                              
they do on a regular basis.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR DYSON asked whether it would  be legal to do mass mailings                                                              
to voters  or to place  ads on TV to  inform voters of  the option                                                              
before  them  when  they  vote  on   the  proposed  constitutional                                                              
amendment.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER said it is his personal  opinion that they could not do                                                              
mass mailings or  anything that would create that  type of expense                                                              
to the fund.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR DYSON expressed concern that  some in the capitol building                                                              
are pushing for  a constitutional amendment to  place the dividend                                                              
in  the  constitution.   He  hopes  that  those   people  wouldn't                                                              
characterize  SJR 18  as being counter  to the  protection  of the                                                              
dividend.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  STORER  replied   they  believe  there  is   some  reasonable                                                              
probability that  placing the dividend  in the constitution  would                                                              
jeopardize the tax-exempt status  of the fund. While the board has                                                              
always held that  how the money is appropriated  is the providence                                                              
of  the Legislature,  they  would  probably  stand mute  were  the                                                              
dividend to be placed in the constitution.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARTHOLOMEW said two points are  critically important when you                                                              
educate the public:                                                                                                             
          · If there isn't leadership coming together from the                                                                  
            House, the Senate and the Executive Office, it will                                                                 
            be very difficult to get a vote from the public.                                                                    
          · Even though the corporation and the board are silent                                                                
            on how to use the funds, it is important that the                                                                   
            Legislature go on record with regard to how they                                                                    
            want to use money.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR JOHN  COWDERY asked  what size  dividend might  be assured                                                              
today were the plan in place six years previous.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER  said he couldn't  give a  specific number, but  he was                                                              
comfortable  saying it would  encompass both  the bull  market and                                                              
the bear market and would smooth out the highs and lows.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COWDERY  asked if the dividend  might not be  between $800                                                              
and $1,000.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. STORER said the dividend would  probably be between $1,000 and                                                              
$1,100 if the fiscal year ended that  evening because the earnings                                                              
reserve is currently about $1.5 million.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Considering  the last  five year  average of  the dividend,  using                                                              
half  of the  five  percent for  dividend  purposes  would give  a                                                              
$1,000 to $1,100 dividend.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COWDERY remarked,  "That would make a lot  of people happy                                                              
and that was free advertising."                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR DYSON  made a  motion to move  CSSJR 18(STA)  and attached                                                              
fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations.                                                                     

Document Name Date/Time Subjects